Posted November 13, 2018 07:30:11I’ve been looking at the law of discrimination since I was in law school.
I was one of the first to study and teach the law at the University of Chicago.
But in college, I didn’t go to law school, but I spent a year at the Center for Civil Rights Law, which was where I met and worked with the civil rights lawyer and activist Gloria Allred.
She was really interested in the history of the issue and the history and the struggle of people of color against discrimination.
And it was at that point that I realized that it was time to make that leap into the world of litigation.
I had been teaching a class called “The Law of Discrimination” for a year, and I would often do class discussions on how we might try to do this.
And I would say, “Let’s take the law to the courtroom.
We could put a lot of time and effort into this, but let’s get it to trial.”
And so, in the fall of 2019, I was sitting with the attorney general, the governor and the attorney generals from Illinois, Pennsylvania and Michigan, and we started to look at a lot more of the legal cases.
And we realized that there was a lot going on, and there was just a lot we didn’t know about the history, and a lot that was not very clear.
And so we set out to build on that knowledge.
We started with a legal history of slavery, and how that history has shaped our civil rights movement.
We looked at how we have tried to bring justice for victims of racism and discrimination and how we do it in our society.
We look at the civil liberties movement, and it really crystallized what the struggle for equality means.
Then, we looked at some of the most common forms of discrimination and racism in the U.S. and tried to understand what it was about those forms of abuse that led to them.
So the course was about the legal history, but also about understanding the historical and social forces that have shaped the way we deal with discrimination and violence.
But the hardest part was to understand the history behind what we were trying to do.
So that’s what we did.
We looked at what was known about the law and what was unknown about the practice.
And that’s how we came up with the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
That’s how the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 was passed, and the Voting Rights Act.
And then, of course, the landmark Voting Rights Amendment Act of 1965, which made sure that voting was done fairly and equally, and that people could vote for whomever they wanted.
That was our starting point.
And over the years, we went through a whole bunch of statutes, and finally, we were able to put together a comprehensive legal history and put together the Voting Section of the Civil rights Act of ’64.
But we knew that the law needed to be updated, and so we decided that we wanted to change the law.
And the challenge was to figure out how we would do that, and where to start.
So we started with the law that is most relevant to the Civil Right movement.
And what we found was that we really did need to re-examine the way that we thought about the civil-rights movement.
It was clear that the civil right was an important issue, but it was unclear whether or not the civil, civil rights would be the same thing.
And when we looked back at the Civil-rights Act of 1866, we found that the Civil War was a great moment in the evolution of the civil society, and our understanding of what we would consider a civil rights law was still evolving.
And there was an attempt to create a law that would make the Civil Amendment, which would allow states to pass laws that guaranteed equal protection under the law, something that was clear to the people of the South.
But then we looked to see what the law would look like in the United States today.
And this was a critical point in our work.
Because it was clear in our law that the only way to protect the rights of the Black and brown Americans of the era, to be able to have a meaningful civil rights system, was through a federal civil rights act, and then the Civil Service Act.
It would be very difficult to enact a law like that today.
So there was no law that could really provide equal protection.
And if we wanted a federal law, we needed to look in the Constitution.
And at the time, there were no national constitutional convention conventions in the country.
So, we had to look to state legislatures.
And one of our great efforts in the 1960s and 1970s was to look into the state constitutions, and to see how they dealt with issues of racial justice.
And in the state of New York, for example, we wrote a bill that would create a federal version of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
We wrote a lot about racial